Bloustein School Home | Rutgers Home | Search Rutgers
Bloustein Center for Survey Research
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Custom Designed Survey and Evaluation Research
    • Telephone Surveys
    • Mail Surveys
    • Web-based Surveys
    • In-Person Surveys
    • Focus Group Discussions
    • Standard Conditions of Engagement
  • Staff
  • Research
  • PRAMS
  • Publications
  • Outreach
    • Overview
    • Assessing Poll Validity
  • Links
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Implementation and effectiveness of integrated trauma and addiction treatment for incarcerated men

Implementation and effectiveness of integrated trauma and addiction treatment for incarcerated men

Wolff, N., Huening, J., Shi, J., & Frueh, B. C., Hoover, D.R., & McHugo, G. (2015). Implementation and effectiveness of integrated trauma and addiction treatment for incarcerated men, Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 30, 66-80.

ABSTRACT: A controlled trial of Seeking Safety (SS) and Male-Trauma Recovery Empowerment Model (M-TREM) examined implementation and effectiveness of integrated group therapy for comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) on PTSD and mental health symptoms plus self-esteem and efficacy for incarcerated men. The study sample (n = 230) was male inmates 18 years or older who were primarily non-white, high school graduates or equivalents, had childhood trauma histories, committed violent crimes, had serious mental illnesses, and resided in a maximum security prison. Incarcerated men, who screened positive for PTSD and SUD, were assigned randomly (n = 142) or by preference (n = 88) to receive SS or M-TREM, with a waitlist group of (n = 93). Manualized interventions were group-administered for 14 weeks. Primary outcomes were PTSD and other mental health symptoms. Secondary outcomes were self-esteem, coping, and self-efficacy. SUD outcomes cannot be measured in a correctional setting. Implementation feasibility was exhibited by the ability to recruit, screen, assign, and retain participants. Effectiveness findings depended on sample, design, and method for analysis.  Using a waitlist control group and no follow-up period, we found no aggregate effect of treatment on PTSD symptoms, although, when disaggregated, M-TREM was found to improve PTSD severity and SS improved general mental health symptoms and psychological functioning. Using intent-to-treat and completer analyses, no significant differences were found in the relative performance between SS and M-TREM on primary or secondary outcomes. When longitudinal data were maximized and modeled in ways that reflect the hierarchical nature of the data, we found that SS and M-TREM performed better than no treatment on PTSD severity and secondary outcomes, and that treatment benefits endured. Findings cautiously support implementing either Seeking Safety or M-TREM to treat incarcerated men with co-morbid PTSD and addiction problems.

Contact Us

  • p (848) 932-1900
  • f (732) 932-1881

Rutgers Links

Rutgers Home
Search Rutgers
Bloustein School Home

Search

Rutgers is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to direct suggestions, comments, or complaints concerning any accessibility issues with Rutgers websites to accessibility@rutgers.edu or complete the Report Accessibility Barrier / Provide Feedback Form.

© 2021 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Bloustein Center for Survey Research | Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
33 Livingston Avenue, Second Floor | New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901